For dev tool and API companies

Developer marketing agency for reach, not respect.

A developer marketing agency decides whether developers ever encounter your product. Most of the category sells credibility. Lumina sells distribution: talks and demos you already recorded, cut into short vertical clips and posted by 62,900+ creators to their own audiences.

A recorded conference keynote on a video page, forty five minutes long, sitting at seventy one views
The diagnosis, in their words

Developers do not find you. They ask a friend.

Every agency on this search says the same thing. Developers distrust marketing, so earn credibility with technical depth. Stack Overflow asked developers what they actually do.

What developers actually do
72.5%

Ask another developer they know when researching a new tool.

Source: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024, 45,181 respondents

What the event budget buys
5.0%

Research a company because it exhibited at an event.

Source: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024, same question

13.8%

Research a company because it advertised to them. The rest of the paid budget, in one number.

Source: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024, same question

75.2%

Start a free trial. That happens after they have heard of you, not before.

Source: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024, same question

The category is solving for the moment a developer reads your page. The published numbers say the problem is three steps earlier, at the moment they never hear your name.

Two jobs, one name

The category sells respect. We sell arrival.

A developer marketing agency is responsible for whether developers ever encounter your product. That covers taking long form material a company already recorded, cutting it into short vertical clips, distributing it, and reporting on what was watched. Writing the technical content is a separate discipline, and so is staffing a developer relations team.

Developer relations is a function you hire. Developer marketing is the demand work around it. Lumina is neither. Lumina distributes: talks, demos and webinars you already own, cut into short form video clipping of 12 to 35 seconds, posted natively by 62,900+ creators on their own accounts.

It is not paid advertising, and it is not a developer ad network. The posts are organic, they sit on real accounts with real audiences, and they stay live after the campaign ends.

What this is not
  • A developer relations team you staff
  • Another technical blog programme
  • Ad inventory on a developer site
  • A conference booth and a speaking slot
What this is
  • A network that carries what you already recorded
  • Clips posted on accounts developers already follow
  • Organic posts you pay for only when views are verified
  • Reach that does not end when the event does

If there is no recording to start from, the product itself can be the source. That is clipping the product itself.

Published by the organisers

The most expensive 55 views in software.

Your engineers wrote the talk. Someone flew them there. The room was full. Then the recording went to a channel. These are the organisers' own published numbers.

71

Average views per session across an entire KubeCon recorded programme, in the weeks after the event

17,000 views across 239 sessions · CNCF Transparency Report, KubeCon Europe 2022, Valencia

Conference reach and cost, taken from organiser transparency reports and sponsorship prospectuses
WhatPublished figurePublished by
KubeCon Europe 2022, registrations18,550CNCF, Valencia report
The entire recorded programme, five weeks later17,000 views across 239 sessionsCNCF, Valencia report
KubeCon China 2023, entire recorded programme6,300 views across 115 sessionsCNCF, 7 December 2023
Share of the room holding a sponsor badge33% of 9,388 registrationsCNCF, Atlanta 2025
Talks submitted against talks accepted2,247 submitted, 409 acceptedCNCF, Atlanta 2025
Lowest tier that carries a speaking opportunityDiamond, from $125,000Linux Foundation, KubeCon China 2026
Top sponsorship tier, 2,500+ attendees$160,000Python Software Foundation, 2026

Figures as published by CNCF, the Linux Foundation and the Python Software Foundation in their own reports and prospectuses

KubeCon Europe 2022, registrations

18,550

CNCF, Valencia report

The entire recorded programme, five weeks later

17,000 views across 239 sessions

CNCF, Valencia report

KubeCon China 2023, entire recorded programme

6,300 views across 115 sessions

CNCF, 7 December 2023

Share of the room holding a sponsor badge

33% of 9,388 registrations

CNCF, Atlanta 2025

Talks submitted against talks accepted

2,247 submitted, 409 accepted

CNCF, Atlanta 2025

Lowest tier that carries a speaking opportunity

Diamond, from $125,000

Linux Foundation, KubeCon China 2026

Top sponsorship tier, 2,500+ attendees

$160,000

Python Software Foundation, 2026

Figures as published by CNCF, the Linux Foundation and the Python Software Foundation

Read these honestly. The view counts are playlist totals at a fixed date, not lifetime views, and they are from 2022 and 2023. CNCF stopped publishing the metric after 2023. The $125,000 speaking tier is the China event, and the flagship US and EU prospectuses are not published at public URLs, so nothing here is extrapolated to them.

The talk was good. The room was full. Then it went to a channel where the average session finishes on two figures, and the invoice had already cleared.

The channel nobody here names

Where developers actually look.

Not one page ranking for developer marketing agency mentions YouTube. Not one. Here is what developers say when they are asked directly.

Where developers learn about new tools

Select all that apply. YouTube sits second, above Stack Overflow and blogs, and it rose from 45% the year before.

Docs and APIs 58%
YouTube 51%
Stack Overflow 43%
Python.org 41%
Blogs 38%

Source: Python Developers Survey 2024, Python Software Foundation and JetBrains, 30,000+ respondents across roughly 200 countries

And it is not a junior habit

Learned to code from video in the past year, by age band. The floor is 43.8% at 55 to 64.

18 to 24 55.2%
25 to 34 50.5%
35 to 44 48.0%
45 to 54 48.4%
55 to 64 43.8%

Source: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025, 33,454 respondents

60.5%

YouTube is the third most used community platform among developers, behind Stack Overflow at 84.2% and GitHub at 66.9%. A second source, so the argument does not rest on one survey. Source: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025, 30,190 respondents

Your buyers are already watching other developers explain software. The only question is whether one of those videos is about yours.

Price your back catalogue

Your talks are already paid for.

Count what you published last year and what it cost to be in those rooms. The view figures are the organisers' own.

Talk ledger Published averages
12
140

Conference talks, webinars, meetups, anything recorded and uploaded.

$0
Skip$500,000

Sponsorship, booth, travel, stand build, the team's time. Leave it at zero to skip.

What the whole year earned
660 to 852

views across every session, using the two published averages

Per session
55 to 71
Cost per view
$0

Estimated from published averages. KubeCon Europe 2022 recorded 17,000 views across 239 sessions, roughly 71 each. KubeCon China 2023 recorded 6,300 across 115, roughly 55 each. Both are playlist totals in the weeks after the event, not lifetime views, and CNCF stopped publishing the metric after 2023.

Nobody needs to make you another video. You are already sitting on a year of them, and the only thing missing is an audience that was ever going to press play.

The same sum, written out

Twelve talks. One conference year.

Two published averages exist for a recorded conference session. The arithmetic from there is short.

  1. KubeCon Europe 2022, 17,000 views across 239 sessions 71 per session
  2. KubeCon China 2023, 6,300 views across 115 sessions 55 per session
  3. Twelve recorded sessions across one year 660 to 852 views
  4. What a year of speaking earned, in total 852

Source: CNCF Transparency Reports, KubeCon Europe 2022 and KubeCon China 2023

A single clip carried by one creator with an existing audience can pass that in an afternoon. The talk was never the problem. Speaking at more conferences does not solve it, and neither does a bigger booth.

The same budget, three outcomes

Three ways to reach a developer.

What a production agency, an AI clip tool and Lumina each deliver
Attribute Conference programmeRents you a room Developer ad networkRents you a page LuminaBorrows an audience
What the price buys A speaking slot and a boothImpressions on one siteVerified views
Who carries it The organiser, for three daysThe network, while funded62,900+ creators
Whose audience Attendees, a third of them other vendorsReaders of one propertyTheirs
What you supply A talk, travel, a team, monthsCreative and budget One recording, about 5 minutes
Time to live The date on the scheduleAs fast as the campaign starts 24 to 72 hours from the call
What happens after The recording goes to a channelDelivery stopsPosts stay live
Who carries the risk if nobody watches YouYouWe do not bill unverified views

Conference programmeRents you a room

What the price buys
A speaking slot and a booth
Who carries it
The organiser, for three days
Whose audience
Attendees, a third of them other vendors
What you supply
A talk, travel, a team, months
Time to live
The date on the schedule
What happens after
The recording goes to a channel
Risk if nobody watches
You

Developer ad networkRents you a page

What the price buys
Impressions on one site
Who carries it
The network, while funded
Whose audience
Readers of one property
What you supply
Creative and budget
Time to live
As fast as the campaign starts
What happens after
Delivery stops
Risk if nobody watches
You

LuminaBorrows an audience

What the price buys
Verified views
Who carries it
62,900+ creators
Whose audience
Theirs
What you supply
One recording, about 5 minutes
Time to live
24 to 72 hours from the call
What happens after
Posts stay live
Risk if nobody watches
We do not bill unverified views

A booth rents you three days. An ad rents you a month. Neither one is measured on whether a developer ever watched anything.

Published rates, not our estimates

Priced by the week. Not by the view.

Published prices for developer marketing engagements, taken from each agency's own site
Deliverable Published price Published by
Developer Marketing Assessment, 8 weeksStarts at $50,000Iron Horse
Developer Acquisition Program, 8 weeksStarts at $25,000 per segmentIron Horse
Content retainer$10,000 to $15,000 per monthColumn Five
Growth and Scale tiers$20,000 to $25,000 per monthColumn Five
Developer content retainer, 3 month minimum$9,000 per monthDraft.dev
Content retainer, one off pieces $1,000 to $3,000Around $10,000 per monthAnimalz
The category range, as their ad sales blog puts it$8,000 to $28,000 per monthdaily.dev
One in house developer marketing hire$180,000+ per yeardaily.dev

Prices as published by each agency on their own site, August 2026. The daily.dev rows are that company's own claim about the category, published on its advertising blog, not a market benchmark.

Developer Marketing Assessment, 8 weeks

Starts at $50,000

Iron Horse

Developer Acquisition Program, 8 weeks

Starts at $25,000 per segment

Iron Horse

Content retainer

$10,000 to $15,000 per month

Column Five

Growth and Scale tiers

$20,000 to $25,000 per month

Column Five

Developer content retainer, 3 month minimum

$9,000 per month

Draft.dev

Content retainer

Around $10,000 per month

Animalz

The category range, as their ad sales blog puts it

$8,000 to $28,000 per month

daily.dev

One in house developer marketing hire

$180,000+ per year

daily.dev

Prices as published by each agency on their own site, August 2026. The daily.dev rows are that company's own claim about the category, published on its advertising blog, not a market benchmark.

An eight week assessment at $50,000 buys a document. A retainer at $15,000 a month buys articles. That is not a criticism of the work, the work is good. It is a description of who carries the risk, and on every line of that table it is you.

How Lumina prices instead
No retainer No price per clip No minimum term

A custom CPM per 1,000 verified views, set against your niche and your volume. Campaigns run from $5,000 to $200,000+, scoped on a call before anything starts. Views that fail verification are not billed.

How it runs

One talk. Dozens of clips.

The talk is already recorded. Clips come out, and you approve everything before any of it is posted.

01

Send one talk

A conference session, a webinar, a demo. Roughly 20 minutes is plenty.

02

We cut it, you approve

Every clip is sent back before anything goes out.

03

62,900+ clippers post

From their own accounts, in the format each platform rewards.

04

You pay for verified views

Views that were checked, not impressions that were served.

About five minutes of your time Clips live in 24 to 72 hours

That is the summary. If you want the full version, how a campaign runs end to end covers the approvals, the reporting and what happens in week two.

Straight answers

What dev tool teams actually ask.

A developer marketing agency is responsible for whether developers ever encounter your product. That covers taking long form material a company already recorded, cutting it into short vertical clips, distributing them, and reporting on what was watched. Writing the technical content is a separate discipline.

Developer relations is a function you staff, focused on supporting and advocating for developers who already use the product. Developer marketing is the demand work around it, focused on developers who have never heard of you. Lumina is neither, and does distribution only.

Published rates run from $9,000 a month for a developer content retainer to $50,000 for an eight week assessment. Lumina prices differently, on a custom CPM per 1,000 verified views. Campaigns run from $5,000 to $200,000+, and there is no retainer.

Because almost none of it reaches them in the first place. When developers research a new tool, 72.5% ask another developer they know, 13.8% research a company that advertised, and 5.0% research a company that exhibited at an event.

Yes, and not only the junior ones. YouTube is the second source developers use to learn about new tools at 51%, behind documentation at 58%. Half of developers learned to code from video in the past year, and that holds at 43.8% among the 55 to 64 group.

Usually very little. KubeCon Europe 2022 had 18,550 registrations, and five weeks later its entire recorded programme of 239 sessions had 17,000 views between them. That is roughly 71 views a session, from a room that was full.

Anything not answered here gets answered on the call. Book a strategy call.

Free, no call needed

Send one recording. Get a clip plan back.

Paste a link to any product recording you already have. We watch it and send back the plan we would run, whether or not you ever hire us.

One link is enough. No card, no form, and no obligation to do anything with it.

18B+ verified views delivered to date.